Discharge- Frustration Flashcards
(9 cards)
Discharge by Frustration Introduction/ definition
- The contract between X and Y may have been frustrated
-This is where the contract becomes impossible to perform, due to a frustrating event. Frustration require performance as envisaged in the contract to become impossible as a result of outside events beyond the control and contemplation of the parties.
Discharge by frustration-strict rule
The strict rule is that parties will be bound to perform their duties regardless of what happens (Paradine vs Jane)
- Apply strict rule to the scenario
Discharge by frustration stage 2 summary
Stage 2- identify the possible grounds for frustration.
1- Impossibility of performance
2- Subsequent illegality
3- Radical change in circumstances
Types of frustration- type 1
- Impossibility of performance- The contract will be frustrated if the contract is impossible to perform (Taylor vs Caldwell). This can be due to the place, the person, or the “thing” becoming unavailable.
- Side rule- In a contract for services, the frustrating event may be the unavailability of the party who is to perform the service (Robinson vs Davidson)
Types of frustration- type 2
2- Subsequent Illegality- The contract will be frustrated if a change in law makes the contract illegal to perform (Denny, Mott&Dickinson Ltd)
Types of Frustration- type 3
3- Radical change in circumstances- The contract will be frustrated if the essential purpose of the contract cannot be achieved, meaning there is now no point in the contract (Krell vs Henry)
Frustration stage 3
- Identify the possible counter- arguments to frustration:
1- Self- Induced Frustration (Maritime National Fish Ltd vs Ocean Trawlers Ltd)
2- Contract becoming les profitable/ more difficult to complete (Davis Contractors Ltd)
3- Foreseeable Risk (Amalgamated Investment vs Walker&Sons)
Frustration stage 4
-Remedies for Frustration:
-At common law, the frustrating event automatically terminates the contract and any obligations already existing must be completed but future obligations are terminated.
-Under section 1 of the Law Reform (Frustrated contracts) act 1943:
-S1(2)- money already paid is recoverable
-S1(2)Money outstanding is not payable
-S1(2)- The court can order compensation for work done and expenses incurred- to a just amount of what was put into the contract
Frustration stage 5
- If there is a counter- argument to frustration, and as a result it is not granted, then that party will be in breach of their contract.
- Fully explain and apply breach
-This stage is conditional so only apply if frustration will not be granted