Chap 17 Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

the symbolic process in which a communicator intentionally creates a message in an attempt to convince others to change their attitudes or behaviors in an atmosphere of free choice

A

persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reasons to accept an argument that the speaker creates in the audience

A

artistic proofs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

intentional, purposeful speaking that involves reason and judgement

A

argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

debatable point or proposal you want listeners to accept

A

claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

supporting material offered to back up a claim

A

grounds, data, or evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

a claim presented without supporting evidence

A

assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

justification or reasoning that connects the claim and the evidence

A

warrent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

reasons given to support the warrent

A

backing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

words and phrases that limit or narrow the scope of a claim

A

qualifiers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

arguments that counter or disagree with a claim

A

rebuttal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

personal credibility or character traits that make a speaker believable and worth of the audience’s cofidence

A

ethos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

concerns shared among speakers and listeners that help overcome divisions and bring diverse people together

A

identification or co-orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

specific areas or concerns that both speaker an audience consider important

A

common ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

internal, individualized factor that results when we understand how topics affect our lives in a personal way

A

motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

appeals or reasons directed toward audience emotions

A

pathos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

arguments from the words of the speech itself, often called rational proofs

17
Q

a polarizing speaker who appeals to audiences more on the basis of emotion and personal charisma than on reasoned arguments

18
Q

comparison of one item that’s less familiar or unknown to something concrete and familiar

19
Q

comparing two things that are generally different but share a recognizable similarity

A

reasoning by metaphor

20
Q

comparing likenesses between two similar things; arguing that what happened in a known case will likely happen in a similar case

A

parallel case or literal analogy

21
Q

starting with specific instances or examples then formulating a reasonable conclusion

A

inductive reasoning

22
Q

starting with a principle and applying it to a specific case

A

deductive reasoning

23
Q

omitting part of the syllogism in an argument and letting listeners supply what’s missing; inherently dialogical

24
Q

linking two factors in such as way that the first occurs before the second and regularly leads to the second as a matter of rule

A

casual reasoning

25
failure in logical reasoning that leads to unsound or misleading arguments
fallacy
26
an appeal to popular opinion
ad populum
27
comparing two things too dissimilar to warrant the conclusion drawn
false analogy
28
a fallacy of induction; generalizing too broadly, given the evidence
faulty generalization
29
a fallacy of causation; saying one small thing will lead to larger things without offering proof
slippery slope
30
a fallacy of causation; a false cause
post hoc
31
an either-or fallacy that ignores other reasonable opinions
false dichotomy
32
inviting audiences to enter and understand the rhetor's world and then share their own perspectives; focuses on mutual understanding an mutual influence, not winning or change per se
invitational rhetoric
33
creatively framing a divisive issue or viewpoint in a different way that may be less threatening
re-sourcement
34
listening without interrupting or inserting oneself into the talk
absolute listening
35
an attempt to think from the other's perspective as well as one's own
reversibility of perspectives
OSZAR »